Compare

FGP vs. Hiring In-House

An employee is the highest-control option and the highest-management option. Both are true at the same time.

Where Hiring In-House is strong

A strong in-house hire is dedicated, present, and can develop deep knowledge of your business over time.

Where the structure still leaks

You take on recruiting, training, payroll, management, performance, and coverage — and you carry a fixed cost through slow quarters.

Side by side

The practical difference.

Toggle the view, or scroll — the stronger option lights up line by line.

The difference
Hiring In-House
FGP
Time to productive
Weeks to months
Scoped and started
Management load
Ongoing and yours
Handled by us
Skill coverage
One generalist
Specialists per function
Cost structure
Fixed
Scoped to the work
If it does not work out
Rehire and retrain
Adjust the scope
Systems and process
You build them
Already running

A one-page summary of the side-by-side and the cost math — easy to share.

When to choose the other option

In-house makes sense when the role is full-time, well understood, and you genuinely want to manage a team.

The next step

You do not need another person to manage. You need the work managed.

Tell us what you were about to do — hire, subscribe, or outsource. We will compare it against your workload honestly and tell you where FGP fits.

No pressure and no obligation. If FGP is not the right fit, we will tell you.